NYT Caught Again Favoring Terrorists

The New York Times is the flagship of the Hate America and Bash Bush crowd, releasing all sorts of highly classified USG materials in order to assist the terrorists in avoiding apprehension. And assisting US lawbreakers who leak these secrets by giving them anonymity.

But the NYT, going back to its Walter Duranty mode of praising human monsters and protecting their plans and apprentices, the Times does not publish a story on terrorists due to their tender deference to British legal restrictions.

Hot Air has more on this shambles, including a pious quote from Jill Abramson, whom I knew when she was at the Wall Street Journal.

"It’s never a happy choice to deny any reader a story," said Jill Abramson, a managing editor at The Times. "But this was preferable to not having it on the Web at all."

Yes, the New York Times decrying having to withhold news from some overseas readers because of silly legal restrictions. But she and her bosses never complain about giving terrorist groups the heads-up on financial transfers or NSA wiretapping.

Double Standard. Same old story: the enemy of America is the NYT's friend. Duranty had his Pulitzer for excessive adulation of Stalinist purge trials pulled. Hopefully, some day Risen and Lichtblau [and fellow traveller Dana Priest at the Post] will suffer the same indignity.

No people deserve it more.