Arthur Brisbane & Dan Okrent Tattle on the NYT

Clueless crone Jill Abramson is a laff a minute. Here's the latest body slam from the Wall Street Journal on the NYT's failure to maintain its equilibrium:

The New York Times is a left-wing paper. We're pretty sure we've mentioned that before, but now we have it on the authority of Arthur Brisbane, the paper's departing "public editor":

The hive on Eighth Avenue is powerfully shaped by a culture of like minds--a phenomenon, I believe, that is more easily recognized from without than from within.
When The Times covers a national presidential campaign, I have found that the lead editors and reporters are disciplined about enforcing fairness and balance, and usually succeed in doing so. Across the paper's many departments, though, so many share a kind of political and cultural progressivism--for lack of a better term--that this worldview virtually bleeds through the fabric of The Times.
As a result, developments like the Occupy movement and gay marriage seem almost to erupt in The Times, overloved and undermanaged, more like causes than news subjects.

Politico.com reports that the paper's head of news, executive editor Jill Abramson, "says she disagrees with Brisbane's 'sweeping conclusions' ":

"In our newsroom we are always conscious that the way we view an issue in New York is not necessarily the way it is viewed in the rest of the country or world. I disagree with Mr. Brisbane's sweeping conclusions," Abramson told Politico Saturday night.
"I agree with another past public editor, Dan Okrent, and my predecessor as executive editor, Bill Keller, that in covering some social and cultural issues, the Times sometimes reflects its urban and cosmopolitan base," she continued. "But I also often quote, including in talks with Mr. Brisbane, another executive editor, Abe Rosenthal, who wanted to be remembered for keeping 'the paper straight.' That's essential."

Here's what Dan Okrent wrote, in his 2004 valedictory column, titled "Is the New York Times a Liberal Newspaper?":

Of course it is. . . .
I'll get to the politics-and-policy issues this fall (I want to watch the campaign coverage before I conclude anything), but for now my concern is the flammable stuff that ignites the right. These are the social issues: gay rights, gun control, abortion and environmental regulation, among others. And if you think The Times plays it down the middle on any of them, you've been reading the paper with your eyes closed.

Is that any different from Brisbane's point? If anything, Okrent's criticism was harsher.

Hard-left agitator Abramson should take that broom she claims Brisbane uses to handle his conclusions and fly off on it.