Barry Soetero Was No Law Prof, Nor Was He "Editor" of the Harvard Law Review

Doub Ross has the goods on the third-rate loser the US media/agitprop/academia/Hollyweirdo psycho left pushed successfully to be POTUS in 2008.

Baracko-Zero, AKA Stephen Q. Urkel, was rejected by the U. of Chicago Law Faculty for any position, but then the Board of Trustees --- here's Ross's version:

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about "Barry." Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn't even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn't have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

Ross notes that BHO "voluntarily surrendered" his law license in 2008, speculating that this might be to erase the "fibs" on his bar application.

Ditto for wife Michelle in 1993, and the records for why she "voluntarily surrendered" her license are, like Obama's state Senate race campaign fund records and his "senior thesis" at Columbia U., conveniently disappeared. Michelle had a job as "legal counsellor" at the U. of Chicago Hospital without her law license, another example of Illinois legal shenanigans' haywire BS. Ross and others speculate that Michelle must have been forced, like Bill Clinton for lying under oath, to give up her license before it was taken away from her.

Ross ends the long line of indictments with "this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court" in the SOTU address? An adjunct flunky who never published a single article on the law, yet claimed to be an EDITOR of the Harvard Law Review? A commenter points out that he was actually "President" of the Harvard Law Review, a job requiring no work, no writing, and essentially just a popularity contest.

As one commenter says: "The license stuff is interesting. Would have been nice to have the media actually, you know, look in to Obama's history with a tenth of the intensity with which they looked through Sarah Palin's garbage."